Ironically, the first section I decided to check out "Leonardo de Vinci's collections and the archivist has stated "it is not arranged in any specific order" but intends to do so in the future. Regardless of the lack of specific order, immediately, the layout is quite nice. The scanning of his papers, drawings, sketches, etc. is visually appealing and as the user clicks on each page it folds over nicely just like a hands on book. There are descriptions of each page on the left written from the archivist, which I personally enjoy.
I'm not quite sure I would say that this is the most user-friendly digital archive as I had to sift through a lot before I figured out what was going on. The initial page is organized and inviting and the presentation of the material is pleasant on the eyes and informative, however, when searching for the Shakespeare archive (which is suppose to be the best) it took a while to find.
On the homepage the archives are organized via maps, books, exhibitions and this separations categories I find to be incredibly helpful.
![]() |
| Homepage |
After perusing a few archives I would say that it is somewhat user friendly, the speed of upload is slower, which can be frustrating, but the visual elements are great and the story map is one of the best I've experienced in comparison to other archives. I think what I find that I enjoy the most is when looking at the online book archives (Jane Austen being my favorite!) it's nice to get the experience of turning the pages of the manuscripts with a visual element that makes it seem like the manuscript is in your hand and then having the archivist input their words on the left of the screen. The experience of both the archivist handling the work, submitting the work, and then talking about it I feel adds to the digital humanities aspect. Check out the Jane Austen and Leonardo da Vinci because they are wonderful!

It's interesting that you like this more curated feel, with the archivist's writings included. So different from Doig where we just have the "stuff."
ReplyDelete